WEEK 40 · GOVERNANCE

Find out who vetted the room.

Most events sell access to anyone who pays, and the fix starts with asking who decided you belonged there.

Time is truly the most valuable commodity we have to offer and use. After 30 years, I have found "conferences" are one of the most wasteful uses of such a valuable commodity, and here is why.

Most of what we call professional development runs on an applause economy. It's a popularity contest like any other, a place for those with a loud voice, and it props up so many truly unqualified people sharing experiences as if they were authoritative.

The model is to throw it all at the wall. Anyone with money can attend, and any supplier with money can sponsor its way into the room. The people who want an audience build the agenda, fill it with whoever will take the stage, and put unqualified speakers in front of everyone who paid to sit there. Then the whole event hopes value shows up somewhere before the closing session.

Hope is the business model. You're the one paying for it.

I call the speakers it props up the echoes. You know the person has a role and a title, and their background suggests they lack depth. There's an air to it that says I use the right words, and often in the right context, but I lack the true experience of applying them, sharpening them, and delivering them at value. An echo sounds right because somebody real said it first.

So ask what a conference truly offers the organization or individual that pays to attend. The honest answer is community and networks. That value is immeasurable, non-quantifiable, and non-transferable, and the applause economy charges full price for it while claiming to sell the content.

Last week I sat in a room built the other way. They billed it as a conference, and I won't call it one, because a conference carries a connotation. This was an intimate gathering of vetted participants on all sides.

A technology broker curated every piece of it, preselecting the tech leaders and curating the suppliers to attend for the problems those leaders actually had. Sponsorship paid for the event, so the attendees didn't. Nobody paid to hope for a match, because the match came first and the invitations followed it.

The broker gave the opening keynote and spent it explaining the buyer and seller market as it actually runs. They walked through how the money passes, how SPIFs work, how the channel operates, and who all gets paid, the broker included, which is detail most buyers never hear at all.

A broker earns a residual commission from the supplier, a percentage of the customer's bill for as long as the service stays active, so a bad match stops paying the month the client walks. Laying that out in the opening keynote was education and transparency, delivered in the slot every other event hands to its loudest voice.

I'll take an incentive I can see over the ones the applause economy never puts on the agenda.

So, here's the MondayMove

Pick the next event on your calendar and find out who vetted the attendees and who vetted the suppliers. If the answer to both is nobody, you're paying for applause.

Find something different, something that brings value and a return on your time investment. Build value for you and for the entity that paid for you to attend, in solid, trusted relationships that stay with you and grow you as a crafted worker, and leave value behind for the organization that invested its time and resources in you attending.

Friday Follow-Up

The old model was already on my calendar.

I ran the question against my own calendar, and the old model was sitting right there.

MondayMove gives you one concrete action every Monday. FridayFollowUp closes the loop.

Each Friday, a short dispatch on what practitioners actually found when they ran the week's move: where they got stuck, what surprised them, and what to do next. Not sanitized case studies. Field notes. Practitioner to practitioner.

Monday's move was one question about the next event on your calendar: who vetted the attendees, and who vetted the suppliers. I ran it against my own calendar first.

What I found was the traditional model in play, with everyone acting interested in my issue, for their own gain. None of that is new, and I've sat through it for years. The difference is that I know how to recognize it now, and once you can, a supplier's interest in your problem stops passing for help.

The room from last week is already paying off. One of the connections I made there is a new solutions firm, now working in my blind spots and adding expertise where I lacked it.

Several things are already in motion with my team. One of them is a complex, meet-me-anywhere networking issue, and that's exactly the value Monday said conferences never leave behind, the kind that stays with the organization that paid for the seat.

If I went back, I'd come better prepared to use it. I'd bring my work notes and roadmaps, details and all, because a curated room rewards the buyer who shows up with the problem already on paper.

Where I expect this to break for you is the answer itself. Ask an organizer who vetted the attendees and you'll probably hear about registration numbers, or a sponsor list presented as curation. Push once more and ask who decided a particular supplier belonged in that room.

So extend Monday's move. Before your next supplier conversation, curated room or not, write the problem down, attach your notes and roadmap, and send it ahead. Then watch who comes back with your problem and who comes back with their product.

Keep going. See what a week can do.

No correct answers here. This is practitioner-to-practitioner. The more honest the responses, the more useful this gets for everyone reading on Monday morning.

See you then.

Discussion